nach oben

Journal of Crop Health

25.03.2024 | Original Article / Originalbeitrag

Quantitative and Qualitative Responses of Quinoa to Soil Application of Growth-promoting Microorganisms Under Water Stress

verfasst von: Seyed Hassan Hosseini, Amir Bostani

Erschienen in: Journal of Crop Health

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) is highly resistant to a wide range of environmental stresses, including drought and salinity stresses. To evaluate the effect of bio-fertilizer and drought stress on the quantitative and qualitative traits of quinoa, an experiment was conducted on Research Farm, Shahed University in 2018. The main factors included irrigation interval 7, 10, 13, 16 days and the soil application of growth-promoting microorganisms (0, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3% concentrations during the growth period) arranged in the sub-factor. The results showed that by increasing irrigation interval period, grain yield, 1000-grain weight and chlorophyll content decreased. The highest plant height (155.7 cm), leaves area (1543.6 cm²/plant), 1000-grain weight (2.69 g), chlorophyll a content (19.7 mg g⁻¹ FW), and seed potassium content (2.03%) were observed in 0.2% bio-fertilizer application under 13-day irrigation treatment. Application of 0.3% concentration bio-fertilizer under 13 and 16-day irrigation treatments was caused the highest grain yield (2.51 and 2.47 ton ha⁻¹) which had 14.34 and 12.95% increase compared to the control treatment. The highest percentage of accumulation of nutrients in the seed, including potassium, calcium and magnesium, was observed in the treatments of 0.3% biofertilizer with irrigation at intervals of 13 and 16 days. The results suggest that drought stress adversely affects quinoa quantitative and qualitative traits, and biofertilizer can improve quinoa plant tolerance todrought stress.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Abdallah MM‑S, El Sebai TN, Ramadan AA, E‑Mel-Bassiouny HMS (2020) Physiological and biochemical role of proline, trehalose, and compost on enhancing salinity tolerance of quinoa plant. Bull Natl Res Centre 44:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00354-4CrossRef

Abdelsalam NR, Grad WE, Ghura NS, Khalid AE, Ghareeb RY, Desoky ESM et al (2021) Callus induction and regeneration in sugarcane under drought stress. Saudi J Biol Sci 28(12):7432–7442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.08.047CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Abbas A, Shah AN, Shah AA, Nadeem MA, Alsaleh A, Javed T et al (2022) Genome-wide analysis of invertase gene family, and expression profiling under abiotic stress conditions in potato. Biology 11(4):539. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11040539CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Akhtar G, Faried HN, Razzaq K, Ullah S, Wattoo FM, Shehzad MA et al (2022) Chitosan-induced physiological and biochemical regulations confer drought tolerance in pot marigold (Calendula officinalis L.). Agronomy 12(2):474. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020474CrossRef

Algosaibi AM, Badran AE, Almadini A, Mel-Garawany MM (2017) The effect of irrigation intervals on the growth and yield of quinoa crop and its components. J Agric Sci 9(9):182–189. https://doi.org/10.5539/jas.v9n9p182CrossRef

Ali OI, Fghire R, Anaya F, Benlhabib O, Wahbi S (2019) Physiological and morphological responses of two quinoa cultivars (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to drought stress. Gesunde Pflanz 71:123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-019-00460-yCrossRef

Angeli V, Silva MP, Crispim Massuela D, Khan WM, Hamar A, Khajehei F, Graeff-Hönninger SPiatti C (2020) Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An overview of the potentials of the “golden grain” and socio-economic and environmental aspects of its cultivation and marketization. Foods 9:216. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9020216CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts. Polyphenoloxidase in Beta vulgaris. Plant Physiol 24:1. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Aslam MU, Raza MAS, Saleem MF, Waqas M, Iqbal R, Ahmad S, Haider I (2020) Improving strategic growth stage-based drought tolerance in quinoa by rhizobacterial inoculation. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 51:853–868. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2020.1744634CrossRef

Augé RM, Toler HD, Saxton AM (2015) Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis alters stomatal conductance of host plants more under drought than under amply watered conditions: a meta-analysis. Mycorrhiza 25:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-014-0585-4CrossRefPubMed

Balbaa MG, Osman HT, Kandil EE, Javed T, Lamlom SF, Ali HM et al (2022) Determination of morpho-physiological and yield traits of maize inbred lines (Zea mays L.) under optimal and drought stress conditions. Front Plant Sci 13:959203. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.959203CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Batra NG, Sharma V, Kumari N (2014) Drought-induced changes in chlorophyll fluorescence, photosynthetic pigments, and thylakoid membrane proteins of Vigna radiata. J Plant Interact 9:712–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/17429145.2014.905801CrossRef

Begum N, Qin C, Ahanger MA, Raza S, Khan MI, Ahmed N, Ashraf M, Zhang L (2019) Role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant growth regulation: implications in abiotic stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci 10:1068. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01068CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Black C (1965) Chemical and microbiological properties. Method Soil Anal Part2 9:1387–1388

Bouyoucos GJ (1962) Hydrometer method improved for making particle size analyses of soils. Agron J 54:464–465. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1962.00021962005400050028xCrossRef

Carlier E, Rovera M, Jaume AR, Rosas SB (2008) Improvement of growth, under field conditions, of wheat inoculated with Pseudomonas chlororaphis subsp. aurantiaca SR1. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 24:2653–2658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-008-9791-6CrossRef

Chapman HD, Pratt PF (1962) Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. Soil Sci 93:68CrossRef

Dong B, Zheng X, Liu H, Able JA, Yang H, Zhao H, Zhang M, Qiao Y, Wang Y, Liu M (2017) Effects of drought stress on pollen sterility, grain yield, abscisic acid and protective enzymes in two winter wheat cultivars. Front Plant Sci 8:1008. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01008CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Ehteshami S, Aghaalikhani M, Khavazi K, Chaichi M (2007) Effect of phosphate solubilizing microorganisms on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of maize (Zea mays L.) under water deficit stress. Pak J Biol Sci 10:3585–3591. https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2007.3585.3591CrossRefPubMed

El Kinany S, Achbani E, Faggroud M, Ouahmane L, El Hilali R, Haggoud A, Bouamri R (2019) Effect of organic fertilizer and commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on the growth of micropropagated date palm cv. Feggouss. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 18:411–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2018.01.004CrossRef

Enebe MC, Babalola OO (2018) The influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in plant tolerance to abiotic stress: a survival strategy. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 102:7821–7835. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-018-9214-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fahad S, Bajwa AA, Nazir U, Anjum SA, Farooq A, Zohaib A, Sadia S, Nasim W, Adkins S, Saud S (2017) Crop production under drought and heat stress: plant responses and management options. Front Plant Sci 8:1147. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01147CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Fayez KA, Bazaid SA (2014) Improving drought and salinity tolerance in barley by application of salicylic acid and potassium nitrate. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 13:45–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2013.01.001CrossRef

Fghire R, Anaya F, Ali OI, Benlhabib O, Ragab R, Wahbi S (2015) Physiological and photosynthetic response of quinoa to drought stress. Chil J Agric Res 75:174–183. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392015000200006CrossRef

Galindo FS, Buzetti S, Rodrigues WL, Boleta EHM, Silva VM, Tavanti RFR, Fernandes GC, Biagini ALC, Rosa PAL, Teixeira Filho MCM (2020) Inoculation of Azospirillum brasilense associated with silicon as a liming source to improve nitrogen fertilization in wheat crops. Sci Rep 10:6160. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63095-4CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Gámez AL, Soba D, Zamarreño ÁM, García-Mina JM, Aranjuelo I, Morales F (2019) Effect of water stress during grain filling on yield, quality and physiological traits of Illpa and Rainbow quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars. Plants 8:173. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8060173CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Geerts S, Raes D, Garcia M, Vacher J, Mamani R, Mendoza J, Huanca R, Morales B, Miranda R, Cusicanqui J (2008) Introducing deficit irrigation to stabilize yields of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Eur J Agron 28:427–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.11.008CrossRef

Ghorbanian D, Harutyunyan S, Mazaheri D, Rasoli V, Mohebi A (2012) Influence of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and different levels of phosphorus on the growth of corn in water stress conditions. Afr J Agric Res 7:2575–2580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00572-013-0515-xCrossRef

Hinojosa L, González JA, Barrios-Masias FH, Fuentes F, Murphy KM (2018) Quinoa abiotic stress responses: a review. Plants 7:106. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants7040106CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Iannucci A, Russo M, Arena L, Di Fonzo N, Martiniello P (2002) Water deficit effects on osmotic adjustment and solute accumulation in leaves of annual clovers. Eur J Agron 16:111–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(01)00121-6CrossRef

Jayme-Oliveira A, Ribeiro Júnior WQ, Ramos MLG, Ziviani AC, Jakelaitis A (2017) Amaranth, quinoa, and millet growth and development under different water regimes in the Brazilian Cerrado. Pesq Agropec Bras 52:561–571. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-204x2017000800001CrossRef

Jutur PP, Reddy AR (2007) Isolation, purification and properties of new restriction endonucleases from Bacillus badius and Bacillus lentus. Microbiol Res 162:378–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2006.01.008CrossRefPubMed

Kakabouki I, Roussis IE, Papastylianou P, Kanatas P, Hela D, Katsenios N, Fuentes F (2019) Growth analysis of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in response to fertilization and soil tillage. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Clujapoca 47(4):1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47411657CrossRef

Karim MR, Rahman MA (2015) Drought risk management for increased cereal production in Asian least developed countries. Weather Clim Extrem 7:24–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2014.10.004CrossRef

Kasim WA, Osman ME, Omar MN, Abd El-Daim IA, Bejai S, Meijer J (2013) Control of drought stress in wheat using plant-growth-promoting bacteria. J Plant Growth Regul 32:122–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-012-9283-7CrossRef

Kolenc Z, Vodnik D, Mandelc S, Javornik B, Kastelec D, Čerenak A (2016) Hop (Humulus lupulus L.) response mechanisms in drought stress: proteomic analysis with physiology. Plant Physiol Biochem 105:67–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.03.026CrossRefPubMed

Lin Y, Watts DB, Kloepper JW, Torbert HA (2018) Influence of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on corn growth under different fertility sources. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 49:1239–1255. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1457155CrossRef

Luo Y, Pang D, Jin M, Chen J, Kong X, Li W, Chang Y, Li Y, Wang Z (2019) Identification of plant hormones and candidate hub genes regulating flag leaf senescence in wheat response to water deficit stress at the grain-filling stage. Plant Direct 3:e152. https://doi.org/10.1002/pld3.152CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Martinez EA, Fuentes FF, Bazile D (2015) History of Quinoa: Its origin, domestication, diversification, and cultivation with particular reference to the Chilean context. In: Quinoa: Improvement and Sustainable Production, pp 19–24CrossRef

Naseri R, Barary M, Zare M, Khavazi K, Tahmasebi Z (2019) Effect of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi on shoot accumulation of micronutrient elements in Keras Sabalan and Saji wheat cultivars under dryland conditions. Appl Field Crop Res (Pajohesh Sazandegi) 32(1):50–80

Nelson D, Sommers LE (1983) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter, Methods of soil analysis: Part 2 chemical and microbiological Properties. 9:539–579. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c34

Nelson R (1983) Carbonate and gypsum, methods of soil analysis: part 2 chemical and microbiological properties. 9:181–197

Pirzad A, Darvishzadeh R, Bernousi I, Hassani A, Sivritepe N (2012) Influence of water deficit on iron and zinc uptake by Matricaria chamomilla L. Chil J Agric Res 72:232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392012000200011CrossRef

Rasouli SM, Barin M, Ashrafi SS, Shakouri F (2019) Effects of phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms and mycorrhizal fungi on the growth parameters of corn (Zea mays L.) under salinity condition. Appl Soil Res 7:25–39

Rudresh D, Shivaprakash M, Prasad R (2005) Effect of combined application of Rhizobium, phosphate solubilizing bacterium and Trichoderma spp. on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of chickpea (Cicer aritenium L.). Appl Soil Ecol 28:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2004.07.005CrossRef

Sadiq M, Akram N, Ashraf M, Ali S (2017) Tocopherol confers water stress tolerance: Sugar and osmoprotectant metabolism in mung bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Agrochimica 61:28–42. https://doi.org/10.12871/0021857201713CrossRef

Sah R, Chakraborty M, Prasad K, Pandit M, Tudu V, Chakravarty M, Narayan S, Rana M, Moharana D (2020) Impact of water deficit stress in maize: Phenology and yield components. Sci Rep 10:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-59689-7CrossRef

Sharif P, Seyedsalehi M, Paladino O, Van Damme P, Sillanpää M, Sharifi A (2018) Effect of drought and salinity stresses on morphological and physiological characteristics of canola. Int J Environ Sci Technol 15:1859–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-017-1508-7CrossRef

Souza TC, Magalhães PC, Castro EM, Duarte VP, Lavinsky AO (2016) Corn root morphoanatomy at different development stages and yield under water stress. Pesq Agropec Bras 51:330–339. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016000400005CrossRef

Tsukanova KA, Chеbоtаr VК, Meyer JJ, MBibikova TN (2017) Effect of plant growth-promoting Rhizobacteria on plant hormone homeostasis. S Afr J Bot 113:91–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2017.07.007CrossRef

Van de Wiel CC, van der Linden CG, Scholten OE (2016) Improving phosphorus use efficiency in agriculture: opportunities for breeding. Euphytica 207:1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1572-3CrossRef

Vinale F, Sivasithamparam K, Ghisalberti EL, Marra R, Woo SL, Lorito M (2008) Trichoderma-plant-pathogen interactions. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-012-0308-5CrossRef

Vurukonda SSKP, Vardharajula S, Shrivastava MSk ZA (2016) Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 184:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.12.003CrossRefPubMed

Wang N, Wang F, Shock CC, Meng C, Qiao L (2020) Effects of management practices on quinoa growth, seed yield, and quality. Agronomy 10:445. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10030445CrossRef

Wu F, Li J, Chen Y, Zhang L, Zhang Y, Wang S, Shi X, Li L, Liang J (2019) Effects of phosphate solubilizing bacteria on the growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake of Camellia oleifera Abel. Forests 10:348. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10040348CrossRef

Xiu-shi Y, Pei-you Q, Hui-min G, Gui-xing R (2019) Quinoa industry development in china. Int J Agric Nat Resour 46:208–219. https://doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v46i2.2157CrossRef

Yang Q, Zheng F, Jia X, Liu P, Dong S, Zhang J, Zhao B (2020) The combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers increases soil organic matter and improves soil microenvironment in wheat-maize field. J Soils Sediments 15:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-020-02606-2CrossRef

Yasmeen R, Siddiqui ZS (2018) Ameliorative effects of Trichoderma harzianum on monocot crops under hydroponic saline environment. Acta Physiol Plantarum 40:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-017-2579-2CrossRef

Yazar A, Sezen S, Mçolak YB (2015) Yield response of quinoa to irrigation with drainage water and planting times in the mediterranean region. IRRIMED2015:“Modern technologies, strategies and tools for sustainable irrigation management and governance in Mediterranean agriculture.

Yooyongwech S, Cha-Um S, Tisarum R, Therawitaya C, Samphumphung T, Aumtong S, Kingkaew J, Phisalaphong M (2018) Influence of different encapsulation types of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on physiological adaptation and growth promotion of maize (Zea mays L.) subjected to water deficit. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca 47(1):213–220. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha47111249CrossRef

Zeid I, Shedeed Z (2006) Response of alfalfa to putrescine treatment under drought stress. Biol Plant 50:635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-006-0099-9CrossRef

Zhu B, Xu Q, Zou Y, Ma S, Zhang X, Xie X, Wang L (2020) Effect of potassium deficiency on growth, antioxidants, ionome and metabolism in rapeseed under drought stress. Plant Growth Regul 90:455–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-019-00545-8CrossRef

Titel: Quantitative and Qualitative Responses of Quinoa to Soil Application of Growth-promoting Microorganisms Under Water Stress
verfasst von: Seyed Hassan Hosseini
Amir Bostani
Publikationsdatum: 25.03.2024
Verlag: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Erschienen in: Journal of Crop Health
Print ISSN: 2948-264X
Elektronische ISSN: 2948-2658
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10343-024-00970-4